الجيواقتصاد وإعادة تشكيل القوة: دراسة مقارنة بين الولايات المتّحدة والصّين

المؤلفون

  • عبدالله جمال حسني يوسف جامعة القاهرة/ كلية الاقتصاد والعلوم السياسية/ قسم العلوم السياسية/ العلاقات الدولية

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30907/jcopolicy.vi71.909

الكلمات المفتاحية:

الجيواقتصاد، توازن القوى، النظام الدولي، الأدوات الاقتصادية

الملخص

ترمي هذه الدراسة إلى تحليل دور السياسات الجيواقتصادية في إعادة تشكيل أنماط القوة داخل النظام الدولي المعاصر، في ظل التراجع النسبي لقدرة القوة العسكرية التقليدية على تفسير النفوذ الدولي. وتنطلق الدراسة من فرضية مفادها أن التوسع في استعمال الأدوات الاقتصادية، مثل التمويل والتجارة والاستثمار والتكنولوجيا، قد أسهم في إعادة صياغة طرق إنتاج القوة وممارستها وإعادة توزيعها بين القوى الكبرى.

وتعالج الدراسة إشكالية رئيسة تتمحور حول: إلى أي مدى أسهم توظيف الأدوات الجيواقتصادية في إعادة تشكيل أنماط القوة بين الولايات المتحدة والصين داخل النظام الدولي؟. ومنهجيًا، تعتمد الدراسة المنهج التحليلي المقارن مدعومًا بالمنهج الوصفي البنيوي؛ وذلك لمقارنة الاستراتيجيات الجيواقتصادية للولايات المتحدة، والصين بوصفهما أنموذجين متمايزين. وتجرى المقارنة من خلال إطار تحليلي يقوم على أربعة معايير رئيسة، هي: طبيعة الأداة الجيواقتصادية، والهدف الاستراتيجي من توظيفها، ودرجة فاعليتها في إعادة تشكيل القوة النسبية، والتكلفة السياسية والاقتصادية المترتبة على استعمالها.

وتظهر نتائج الدراسة أنّ الجيواقتصاد لا يمثل نمطًا مستقلاً أو مطلقًا للقوة، بل يعمل كآلية شرطية ومرنة تتحدد فاعليتها وفق السياقات السياسية والعسكرية والبنيوية الأوسع. كما تكشف النتائج أنّ الولايات المتحدة تعتمد أدوات جيواقتصادية قسرية عالية الفاعلية على المدى القصير والمتوسط، في حين ترتكز الصين على استراتيجية جيواقتصادية تراكمية طويلة الأمد، قائمة على الاستثمار والبنية التحتية وسلاسل التوريد، بما يعزز قوتها تدريجيًّا مع انخفاض الكلفة السياسية المباشرة وبطء التأثير.

المراجع

Aiyar, Shekhar, Jiaqian Chen,Christian H Ebeke,Roberto Garcia-Saltos,Tryggvi Gudmundsson,Anna Ilyina,Alvar Kangur,Tansaya Kunaratskul,Sergio L. Rodriguez,Michele Ruta,Tatjana Schulze,Gabriel Soderberg, and Juan Pedro Trevino. 2023. Geo-economic Fragmentation and the Future of Multilateralism. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400229046.006

Arko, Thelma. 2024. “Climate Finance, Debt and Economic Dependency in Africa.” UNU INRA. September 25, 2024. https://unu.edu/inra/article/climate-finance-debt-and-economic-dependency-africa

Austin, Greg, Kai Lin Tay, and Munish Sharma. 2022. Great-Power Offensive Cyber Campaigns: Experiments in Strategy. London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). https://www.iiss.org/globalassets/media-library---content--migration/files/research-papers/2022/02/great-power-offensive-cyber-campaigns-experiments-in-strategy.pdf

Babic, Milan, Adam D. Dixon, and Imogen T. Liu. 2022. The Political Economy of Geo-economics: Europe in a Changing World. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-18553289-98520ee1a1.pdf

Blackwill, Robert D, and Jennifer M. Harris. 2016. War by Other Means: Geo-economics and Statecraft. USA: Harvard University Press.

Dyer, Geoff. 2014. “Sanctions: War by Other Means.” Financial Times. Mar 30, 2014. https://www.ft.com/content/b18d2c74-b59e-11e3-81cb-00144feabdc0

European Central Bank. 2024. “Global Rifts and Financial Shifts: Supervising Banks in an Era of Geopolitical Instability.” September 26, 2024. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/speeches/date/2024/html/ssm.sp240926_1~ebf2df6685.en.html

Farrell, Henry, and Abraham L. Newman. 2019. “Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion.” International Security 44, no.1 (July): 42-79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351

Garcia-Herrero, Alicia. 2021. “What Is Behind China’s Dual Circulation Strategy?.” Bruegel. September 7, 2021. https://www.bruegel.org/opinion-piece/what-behind-chinas-dual-circulation-strategy

Georgieva, Kristalina, Gita Gopinath, and Ceyla Pazarbasioglu. 2022. “Why We Must Resist Geo-economic Fragmentation - And How.” International Monetary Fund. May 22, 2022. https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2022/05/22/blog-why-we-must-resist-geoeconomic-fragmentation

Goodman, Matthew P. 2025. Reimagining U.S. Economic Statecraft. United States: Council on Foreign Relations. https://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA05/20250514/118242/HHRG-119-FA05-Wstate-GoodmanM-20250514.pdf

Graham, Niels, and Mondrita Rashid. 2023. “Is ‘Friendshoring’ Really Working?.” Atlantic Council. July 25, 2023. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/is-friendshoring-really-working/

Guriev, Sergei, and Hina Rabban. 2015. "Competition for gated markets, not natural resources." In Geo-economics: Seven Challenges to Globalization, 8-9. Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Geo- economics_7_Challenges_Globalization_2015_report.pdf

Haramboure, Antton, Guy Lalanne, Cyrille Schwellnus, and Joaquim Guilhoto. 2023. Vulnerabilities in the Semiconductor Supply Chain. France: OECD Science Technology and Industry Working Papers. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/06/vulnerabilities-in-the-semiconductor-supply-chain_f4de7491/6bed616f-en.pdf

Hogselius, Per. 2019. Energy and Geopolitics. New York: Routledge. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/sdn/2023/english/sdnea2023001.pdf

International Monetary Fund. 2025. “Global Foreign Exchange Reserves Trends.” December 19, 2025. https://data.imf.org/en/Dashboards/COFER%20Dashboard

International Monetary Fund. 2026a. "GDP based on purchasing power parity (PPP), share of world.” January 6, 2026. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/PPPSH@WEO/MAE

International Monetary Fund. 2026b. “Gross domestic product, current prices.” January 6, 2026. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/CHN

ITC. 2025. “Trade Map: List of Exporters for the Selected Product.” August 6, 2025. https://www.trademap.org/Country_SelProduct_TS.aspx?nvpm=1%7c%7c%7c%7c%7cTOTAL%7c%7c%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c2%7c2%7c1%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c1

Kim, Won-Ho. 2025. "US tariff policy and a transformation of global trade architecture." Asia and the Global Economy 5, no.2 (December): 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2025.100120

Kimball, Spencer. 2025. “The biggest takeaways from the Trump-Xi meeting — what the truce covers and what is still unclear.” CNBC. October 30, 2025. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/30/trump-xi-south-korea-rare-earth-tariff-trade-war-nvidia.html

Kozul-Wright, Richard. 2019. “China’s Belt and Road Isn’t Like the Marshall Plan, but Beijing Can Still Learn from It.” UNCTAD. January 25, 2019. https://unctad.org/news/chinas-belt-and-road-isnt-marshall-plan-beijing-can-still-learn-it

Lee, James. 2024. “Geoeconomics Defines a New Phase of International Competition.” UC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation. October 3, 2024. https://ucigcc.org/blog/geoeconomics-defines-a-new-phase-of-international-competition/

Levy, Cindy, Matt Watters, Shubham Singhal, Bryce Bittner, Doron Hindin, and Isabella Bennett. 2025. “Restricted: How Export Controls Are Reshaping Markets.” McKinsey and Company. April 3, 2025. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/geopolitics/our-insights/restricted-how-export-controls-are-reshaping-markets

Luttwak, Edward N. 1990. “From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce.” The National Interest, no.20 (Summer): 17-23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42894676

Manyika, James, Jacques Bughin, Susan Lund, Olivia Nottebohm, David Poulter, Sebastian Jauch, and Sree Ramaswamy. 2014. Global Flows in a Digital Age: How Trade, Finance, People, and Data Connect the World Economy. USA: McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/Globalization/Global%20flows%20in%20a%20digital%20age/MGI%20Global%20flows%20in%20a%20digial%20age%20Executive%20summary.ashx

Marquez de la Rubia, Francisco. 2025. The Battle for Technological Supremacy: The US vs. China. Analysis Paper 23/2025. Madrid: Spanish Institute of Strategic Studies. https://www.defensa.gob.es/documents/2073105/2392118/la_batalla_por_la_supremacia_tecnologica_2025_dieeea23_eng.pdf

McCorvey, J. J. 2025. “A Critical Crossroads’: Business Leaders speak out against Trump’s Trade War with the World.” NBC News. April 7, 2025. https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/trump-tariffs-business-leaders-criticize-trump-admin-trade-war-rcna199997

Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (MOFCOM). 2025. “MOFCOM Holds Regular Press Conference.” April 27, 2025. https://english.mofcom.gov.cn/News/PressConference/art/2025/art_c7fc2b6626ad486eaeade1aca226a84d.html

Nephew, Richard. 2018. The Art of Sanctions: A View from the Field. New York: Columbia University Press.

Office of the United States Trade Representative. 2018. Findings of the Investigation into China’s Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: Executive Summary. March 22, 2018. http://www.iberchina.org/files/2018/ustr_china_summary.pdf

Ringhof, Julian, and Jose Ignacio Torreblanca. 2022. The Geopolitics of Technology: How the EU Can Become a Global Player. Berlin: European Council on Foreign Relations. https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/The-geopolitics-of-technology-How-the-EU-can-become-a-global-player.pdf

Schneider-Petsinger, Marianne. 2016. “Geo-economics Explained.” Chatham House. December 9, 2016. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2016/12/geoeconomics-explained#:~:text=the%20term%20geoeconomics%20has%20become,and%20commodities%2c%20aid%20and%20cyber

Shahzad, Aneela. 2022. “Geo-economics: The New Geopolitics.” Policy Perspectives 19, no.2 (December): 21-40. https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.19.2.ra2

SWIFT. 2025. “RMB Tracker: Monthly Reporting and Statistics on Renminbi (RMB) Progress Towards Becoming an International Currency.” December 17, 2025. https://www.swift.com/products/renminbi-tracker/document-centre

United Nations Trade and Development. 2019. “World Investment Report - Special Economic Zones.” January 6, 2026. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/publications/1204/world-investment-report-2019---special-economic-zones

United Nations Trade and Development. 2022. “World Investment Report- International Tax Reforms and Sustainable Investment.” January 6, 2026. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/publications/1263/world-investment-report-2022-international-tax-reforms-and-sustainable-investment

United Nations Trade and Development. 2025. “World Investment Reports -International investment in the digital economy.” January 6, 2026. https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2025

Wang, Christoph Nedopil. 2026. “China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Investment Report 2025.” Green Finance and Development Center. January 18, 2026. https://greenfdc.org/china-belt-and-road-initiative-bri-investment-report-2025/

Wigell, Mikael, Heiko Borchert, Edward Hunter Christie, Christian Fjader and Lars-Hendrik Hartwig. 2022. Navigating Geo-economics Risks: Towards an International Business Risk and Resilience Monitor. FIIA Report 71. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs. https://reforms-investments.ec.europa.eu/document/download/b873a36e-f1c8-434d-a7cf-5758e7aeda87_en?filename=report_71_navigating-geoeconomic-risks_towards-an-international-business-risk-and-resilience-monitor.pdf&prefLang=da

Woods, Ngaire. 2025. “What If the US Leaves the IMF and the World Bank?.” Australian Strategic Policy Institute. February 24, 2025. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/what-if-the-us-leaves-the-imf-and-the-world-bank/

التنزيلات

منشور

2026-06-01

كيفية الاقتباس

عبدالله جمال حسني يوسف. (2026). الجيواقتصاد وإعادة تشكيل القوة: دراسة مقارنة بين الولايات المتّحدة والصّين. مجلة العلوم السياسية, 71, 283-312. https://doi.org/10.30907/jcopolicy.vi71.909

تواريخ المنشور

الإستلام

2025-11-04

الموافقة

2026-02-03

المؤلفات المشابهة

1-10 من 187

يمكنك أيضاً إبدأ بحثاً متقدماً عن المشابهات لهذا المؤلَّف.